Wow! Software install/config over the web! Fantastic!
And it works! (I just tried it out... smooth and easy.)
Some quick thoughts:
* after I downloaded the shar distribution, I have to invoke
	sh bootkit.shar
  For all I know, this will do a /bin/rf -rf ~ or something nasty
  like that. Granted, it's shell source code and I can read it, but...
  In general, it's not good to teach folks to download and run random
  programs from the net.
  My suggestion is that you allow (encourage) users to check the
  authenticity of the distribution by including (in the instructions
  on the web) all sorts of info including, but not limited to:
	- bytecount
	- gnu checksum
	- svr4 checksum
	- bsd checksum
	- md5 checksum
	- PGP signature
  For legal reasons, you should probably say something like "by
  downloading this distribution, you release EIT from all liability...
  but here's how to contact us for support if you have trouble..."
This is a FANTASTIC demonstration of "home shopping" on the net. We've
all known for a while that it was possible to do this sort of thing --
it's just a matter of testing, support, documentation, and all those
nasty real life things.
I hope this is a success and that lots of other software distributors
follow suit. Getting software from the net could really be revolutionized
this way. If you think about it:
	* every PC, Mac, and unix box ships with TCP/IP, SLIP, PPP,
	  and a forms-capable WWW client. (It'll happen soon. I'd say
	  within a year, 90% of new boxes will be WWW capable. Most
	  businesses will have a net feed of some sort. Home TCP/IP feeds
	  may take a while, but they're coming...)
	* Marketing info for zillions of products is available on the
	  web. We start with archie, which tells you almost nothing
	  about almost everything, and we enrich it via USENET, HTTP,
	  and perhaps other services/protocols to include abstracts, reviews,
	  Seals Of Approval, guides, and other catalog/magazine info.
	  This is were all this URN/URC stuff of replication and
	  authentication comes into play.
	* Users pick the product they like, fill out a form to select
	  the platform/configuration. A custom distribution is built,
	  and shipped over the net. (Licence/fee negotiation will eventually
	  become part of this process. Watermarking software to
	  trace pirated copies will become a reality.)
	  The user can get online doc over the web, or choose to download
	  the documentation, or order printed copies. (A third-party
	  market for bound documentation will probably spring up...)
	* The user follows the instructions on the web for installing
	  and configuring the software.
	* The user can submit bug reports through the same WWW client
	  interface -- or browse other bug reports with resolutions.
	  (again: this facilitates a market for third-party support).
>  Linux and NT
>ports are under consideration.
I volunteer to beta test the Linux port. Or consult, or whatever it
takes to get a linux port done.
I'd love to see linux software distribution completely migrated to
this model. I think it would be great for all the software in the
linux archives to be available this way. The free software community
is the place to research these issues and markets and see how they
work.
Then folks will eventually be willing to pay for documentation,
support, and maintenance for some products. They might be willing
to pay for search services, reviews, consulting, and a whole spectrum
of products.
>We love feedback!  Send mail to wsk@eit.com
I hope you don't mind that I copied www-talk.
Dan