Re: Second draft of HTML+ now available

Dave_Raggett (
Wed, 3 Nov 93 16:20:23 GMT

Josh Osborne comments:

> Speaking of migration paths, if we could define "subsets" of HTML+ and
> MIME types for them we could phase-in HTML+ by providing HTML & HTML+
> pages for things and letting the HTTP server & client decide which to
> fetch...

Sounds good to me. We could use a parameter on the content type, e.g.

Content-Type: text/html; level=2

Where level=0 (the default) is plain old HTML.

Thanks for the other comments. I will fix things up for the next revision
to the discussion document.