> In this context, <IMG> and <FIG> are merely ways of specifying that the
> media be somehow *embedded* into the document when it is presented; as
> concerns this <INCLUDE> idea, for instance, there is no reason why
> "text/html" can't be the "Content-Type:" of a <FIG>.
Recently i discovered that these things had already been thought of, and
were in fact part of the original philosophy. *EVERYONE* should read
and think about how much better things would work now (and still *could
be made to work*) if we followed Tim Berners-Lee's suggestion.
Thanks to Dan Connolly for referencing this message. It has in some way
restored my faith, and in another way made me seriously ponder "How could
things have gone so wrong?" for the development of HTML.
Ping (Ka-Ping Yee): 2B Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Canada
email@example.com | 62A Churchill St, Waterloo N2L 2X2, 519 886-3947
CWSF 89, 90, 92; LIYSF 90, 91; Shad Valley 92; DOE 93; IMO 91, 93; ACMIPC 94
:: Skuld :: Tendou Akane :: Belldandy :: Ayukawa Madoka :: Hayakawa Moemi ::
New! <http://csclub.uwaterloo.ca/u/kryee/> Yeah, i finally made a home page.