Re: Bottom line on ActiveVRML

James Waldrop (sulam@construct.net)
Fri, 08 Dec 1995 12:20:05 -0800

>Scott, the ActiveVRML team is still considering what MIME type to use
>for ActiveVRML files, and I personally think it is better not to use
>x-world/x-vrml.

Well, maybe you should stop calling it VRML? I mean, not to be
rude or anything, but it seems like this proposal has very little
to do with VRML and everything to do with Microsoft's personal
vision of what time-driven multimedia should look like.

Why don't you call it FunctionalLingo? ;)

James

--
James Waldrop                        /          Technical Director
sulam@construct.net              /              Construct Internet Design
sulam@well.com               /                  http://www.construct.net

  • Next message: Clay Graham: "Re: ANNOUNCE: VRML 2.0 proposal from Microsoft graphics groups"
  • Previous message: James Waldrop: "Re: Bottom line on ActiveVRML"
  • Maybe in reply to: Mike McCue : "Bottom line on ActiveVRML"