Re: Need for Clarifications Doc & VRML 1.1 spec
Tim Bray (tbray@opentext.com)
Fri, 24 Nov 95 08:21 PST
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ][ tmesad ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message:
Alan Walford: "My comments on 1.0 clarifications"
- Previous message:
Tim Bray: "Re: Need for Clarifications Doc & VRML 1.1 spec"
- Maybe in reply to:
Tom Gaskins: "Need for Clarifications Doc & VRML 1.1 spec"
Just one more note from the user community:
Yes, 1.1, sooner rather than later, don't wait for 2.0
Please don't forget the IETF model: rough consensus & working code. Quite
frankly, it will be a lot sasier to get 2.0 right if implementors are in
the process of learning what's wrong with 1.1 [because there *will* be
things wrong, every time out, no matter how smart we are].
- Tim Bray
- Next message:
Alan Walford: "My comments on 1.0 clarifications"
- Previous message:
Tim Bray: "Re: Need for Clarifications Doc & VRML 1.1 spec"
- Maybe in reply to:
Tom Gaskins: "Need for Clarifications Doc & VRML 1.1 spec"