Re: Behaviours (Was: Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding)

James Waldrop (sulam@construct.net)
Thu, 19 Oct 1995 11:54:56 -0700

>> We're not trying
>>to simulate rsality here. This is cyberspace, not rsal-space.
>
>THIS may be what YOU think vrml is all about, but not everone shares
>that view. That is why there is so much disagreement on the HOW because
>there is no agreement on the WHAT.

Append appropriate disclaimers, please. I don't believe that VRML
is "all" about anything. For myself, it's not about simulating rsality.
It's difficult enough just to *model* rsality, much less give it rsal
behaviors that are accurate across the Internet. But if you have some
supernetwork (your LAN at Boeing I suppose) that can do this, more
power to you.

James

--
James Waldrop				/   Technical Director
sulam@construct.net		/	    Construct Internet Design
sulam@well.com		/		    http://www.construct.net

  • Next message: Z-John: "A serious VRML 2.0 Proposal"
  • Previous message: James Waldrop: "Re: Question: SFimage X-lators?"
  • In reply to: Wayne Ingalls 206-865-3593: "Re: Behaviours (Was: Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding)"
  • Next in thesad: Bernie Roehl: "Re: Behaviours (Was: Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding)"