Re: Why does DEF do instancing? (fwd)

Z-John (zyang@bezier.CS.Berkeley.EDU)
Tue, 17 Oct 1995 15:38:02 -0700 (PDT)

==>We want DEF ONLY

I'd agree 100%.

Still, I just can't believe people at SGI had come up with the idea of a
instancing DEF. I am talking about serious design flaw here.
We'd better fix vrml, soon. Otherwise, every single browser has to stick
to this defect forever.

......................................................................
. ____ __ __ . Zijiang "Z-John" Yang .
. /_ /______ / /__ / / ___ . zyang@cs.berkeley.edu .
. / //___/ /_/ / _ \/ _ \/ _ \ . Univ. of California,Berkeley .
. /___/ \____/\___/_//_/_//_/ . http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~zyang/ .
......................................................................

  • Next message: J Gwinner/VisNet, I: "Copy of: Re: Why does DEF do instancing? (fwd)"
  • Previous message: peterm@martech.planix.com: "Re: Why does DEF do instancing? (fwd)"
  • In reply to: Master Zap: "Re: Why does DEF do instancing? (fwd)"