> If end users are NOT going to be using VRML directly, and it becomes the
> domain of language generators, authoring tools, compilers, etc., as some
> people have suggested, then the intuitive ease is less an issue than
> efsiciency and language semantics, and the current DEF is a big lose here
> also.
Could you please justify this last statement? I don't see any loss of
efsiciency in the current model, nor do I see any problem with
language semantics.
----
Paul S. Strauss pss@sgi.com Silicon Graphics Computer Systems
Open Inventor Web info in http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Inventor.html