Re: Why does DEF do instancing?

Jeff Sonstein (jeffs@ncgate.newcollege.edu)
Mon, 16 Oct 1995 09:07:52 -0700


<zap@lysator.liu.se> writes:

>DEF blah blah {
>}
>DEF bleh bleh {
>}
>Separator {
> USE blah {}
> USE bleh {}
>}

this was my orig proposal lo these many posts ago... to paraphrase meself:

anything DEFed at the outermost scope of a given file is to be made
available for USE but not rendered

Jeff Sonstein, Networks Administrator
New College of California
50 Fell Street
San Francisco CA 94102
[415] 241-1302 ext. 490
-----------------------
The opinions expressed here do not
esslect anything about my employer,
New College of California
--------- Opinions R Us ---------


  • Next message: Jeff Sonstein: "Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding"
  • Previous message: Gavin Nicol: "Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding"
  • Maybe in reply to: Finn Aarup Nielsen: "Why does DEF do instancing?"
  • Next in thesad: Mitra: "Re: Why does DEF do instancing?"