Re: Client Caching -- Was: Re: Network Abuse by Netscape?

John Kilburg (john@cephas.ISRI.UNLV.EDU)
Mon, 31 Oct 1994 01:01:04 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen: "Mozilla and other applications"
Previous message: Frederick G.M. Roeber: "Test 2"
In reply to: ts: "Client Caching -- Was: Re: Network Abuse by Netscape?"
Next in thread: Brian Behlendorf: "Re: Client Caching -- Was: Re: Network Abuse by Netscape?"

>>[stuff about client caching]
>
> It's a good idea to cache document, but warning some documents are
>protected : don't store these documents in the cache with a mode "644"
>
> Also, I like give an "username/password" when I access a protected
>document for the first time, even if the document is in the cache.
>
>Guy Decoux

I saw your comments about chimera (Brian B. sent them to me)...chimera
1.61 and above no longer caches documents that require authentication.

This was not the smartest thing to do but it is safer and easy.

-john

Next message: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen: "Mozilla and other applications"
Previous message: Frederick G.M. Roeber: "Test 2"
In reply to: ts: "Client Caching -- Was: Re: Network Abuse by Netscape?"
Next in thread: Brian Behlendorf: "Re: Client Caching -- Was: Re: Network Abuse by Netscape?"