Oops, I mean, to contraphrase Tim :-), remembering that contrapuntalism
is not antithetical to harmony!
> >     to return you one or more variant specifiers, one for each variant.
> >     You select the variant you want, and pass it off together with the
> >     URN when you need to lookup the corresponding URL.
I should have said "... to lookup a list of corresponding URLs".
> > 
> > (17)The variant specifier is thus a thing that optionally accompanies
> >     a URN, at the same level in our UR* scheme of things.
> > 
> > (18)We need a new member of the UR* family for variants.  How about URV?
> > 
> So, what you are saying is that
> 
> 	URN + URV = URL
> 
> and that a URL refers to a single instance of a document at a single
> locatation.
No, I'm not saything that.  The pair <URN, URV> maps to one or more URLs.
More like a function call, urn2urlist(URN, URV) = {URL1, URL2, ... }.
For example, <"War and Peace", ASCII> might be in five locations (5 URLs),
and <"War and Peace", PostScript> might be in three locations (3 URLs).
> Although there may be some use of a URV within hypertext (and other
> links), I would think that the typical case would be to just use an
> unadorned URN, since I wouldn't know which variant would be wanted until
> retrieval time.  It would seem that some sort of negotiation/protocol
> would be useful here, even something as simple as what Gopher+ does
> (return list of all variants/views).  This would allow for smart clients
> to do the negiotiation.
The unadorned URN will be *a* typical case, say within hypertext or
within a search result record.  I think of that as the export case,
since that will be how many servers present links and references.
However, another typical case arises out of client collection activities,
which I think of as the import case.  The client may have very strong
notions about which exact URV it wants for a given URN that it is adding
to a local pile of links.  Next time it goes to de-reference those saved
links it will not want to redo all the variant selection it did once
before, which could have been a quite painstaking process.
-John