> * A reply from a protected server starts with a status line:
> HTTP/1.0 202 Privacy enhanced reply follows
Why define a new code? IMHO, all this information should be in headers,
not on the status line. You even already defined headers for this, so
this is really just duplicate information. Does it really serve any
Oh, BTW, TimBL had suggested using WWW-foo: for the new headers we define
to avoid collisions. Of course, any headers you are using from existing
specs or proposals are fine.
We appreciate all your work on this.