Re: WWW Security Hole -- Bull!

Lars-Gunnar Olsson (Lars-Gunnar.Olsson@data.slu.se)
Fri, 13 Aug 1993 15:10:01 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: rhb@hotsand.att.com: "Re: Restricted ports"
Previous message: David Martland: "Unsubscribing (even temporarily!)"
In reply to: Tony Sanders: "Re: WWW Security Hole -- Bull!"
Next in thread: Keith Moore: "Re: WWW Security Hole -- Bull!"

> No, we should throw out application/postscript or fix ghostscript.

This isn't a MIME problem, since the security aspects re postscript are
documented in the MIME RFC. Also, the ghostscript has been fixed a while
ago by adding a SAFER mode. More recently ghostview 1.5 is using this mode by
default, so the problem is hopefully no more.

--lg

Next message: rhb@hotsand.att.com: "Re: Restricted ports"
Previous message: David Martland: "Unsubscribing (even temporarily!)"
In reply to: Tony Sanders: "Re: WWW Security Hole -- Bull!"
Next in thread: Keith Moore: "Re: WWW Security Hole -- Bull!"