There is a strong habit for authors to think if the <P> as a
container and when (if) we can ascribe style to objects within HTML, <P>
as seperator will be *the* most misunderstood idea.
Frankly, I am surprised that it was not defined as such to begin with.
</rr>
On Tue, 20 Jul 1993, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> Rob Raisch writes:
>
> > Is this the proper time to mention that <P> really
> > needs to be a container (ie. <P>Content</P>) ?
> >
> > The abstraction of <P> being a seperator and not
> > a container is the cause of much woe for those of
> > us interested in defining styles.
>
> Why is this? The <P> as separator makes sense to me, and is valid
> SGML.
>
> Nat