> <!ENTITY % HTML.Version "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN"
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML//EN">
> My question: Is the seeming inconsistency between the entity
> replacement text and the comment intentional, or has the comment not
> been updated, or what?
As I understand it, omitting 2.0 means it refers to the latest version.
So at the moment they are identical; if an HTML 2.1 is released,
they won't be.
-- Chris Lilley, Technical Author and JISC representative to W3C +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Manchester and North Training & Education Centre ( MAN T&EC ) | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Computer Graphics Unit, Email: Chris.Lilley@mcc.ac.uk | | Manchester Computing Centre, Voice: +44 161 275 6045 | | Oxford Road, Manchester, UK. Fax: +44 161 275 6040 | | M13 9PL BioMOO: ChrisL | | Timezone: UTC URI: http://info.mcc.ac.uk/CGU/staff/lilley/ | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+