>There are other benefits. I believe it would:
> slow the creation of "tomorrow's legacy documents."
> dispell the myth that the HTML WG is "against" presentation.
> encourage the usage of CLASS, which would contribute to its usage in
>robots and other software.
> allow us to judge how people use CLASS so that we can think about
>standardizing some usages.
> increase the awareness of platform portability issues.
> put the IETF and W3C back in the driver's seat with respect to the
>direction of HTML and the Web.
>Comments? Ideas? Should I present a more technical specification? I would
>imagine the language would be a touched-up subset of the current CSS proposal.
A yes vote.
This would allow style sheets to have a probationary condition until their
use and abuse can be learned from.
email@example.com Amstel 222
ELECTROGIG Europe 1017 AJ Amsterdam
http://www.gig.nl/ The Netherlands