> 1) The content model of the <P> element makes it impossible to embed a
> footnote inside of a paragraph, so that something like this:
This is a misunderstanding. The idea is that you use a hypertext link
from the paragraph to the footnote. The link would be represented with
the <A> element in the normal way. The draft proposal explains how, see:
This is under "Admonishments and Footnotes" in the table of contents.
> 2) I don't think that the content model of NOTE is restrictive enough for a
> footnote element. Footnotes should be short, so things like tables and
> embedded notes and lists don't belong there. It would not be appropriate
> to restrict the content model of NOTE however, so a different element is
> needed for that purpose.
The relaxed content model for NOTE doesn't seem sufficient justification
to me for introducing another new tag. HTML in general provides a lax
content model making it easy to convert other formats into HTML.
-- Dave Raggett <firstname.lastname@example.org> tel: +44 117 922 8046 fax: +44 117 922 8924
Hewlett Packard Laboratories, Filton Road, Bristol BS12 6QZ, United Kingdom